上线一周年之际，光明网网络安全频道全新改版******
光明网讯（记者 李政葳 孔繁鑫）广大网友们，如果最近打开光明网网络安全频道（https://wlaq.gmw.cn/），呈现在大家眼前的，已经是一个崭新的页面。2023年伊始，在光明网网络安全频道上线一周年之际，迎来了首次全新升级改版。
随着网络强国战略的加速推进，我国互联网发展不断迈上新的台阶。光明网在2022年1月份特别开设网络安全频道，秉持“共建网络安全 共享网络文明”的宗旨，持续关注互联网及网络安全发展态势，通过组织品牌活动、开设重点栏目等方式，在互联网及网络安全领域取得良好反响。
针对此次改版，光明网相关负责人表示，为进一步深入学习贯彻网络强国战略思想，不断适应移动互联网时代的变革与创新，持续推动光明网在互联网领域宣传报道出新出彩，经过过去一年的实践积淀，以及各界人士指导建议，光明网启动本次网络安全频道升级改版，进一步承担起新型主流媒体的责任与担当。
扫码进入光明网网络安全频道
进入频道页面，映入眼帘的是灵活现代、清晰明快、雅致大气的视觉设计。页面注重丰富栏目形式、提升信息获取效率、优化浏览互动效果，带来迭代更新的阅读体验，有效适应移动互联网时代网民阅读习惯和个性化需求。此外，新版页面还大幅增加图片、视频展示比例，力求做到文图、视频平衡搭配、相得益彰。
页面左上角的“光明网安”频道logo也发生了变化。颜色以蓝绿配色为主，显得清新爽朗，象征着网络空间天朗气清；一面“盾牌”图标嵌在文字内，代表网络安全重在防护；一侧螺旋式向上的箭头，喻义网络安全发展建设螺旋上升、任重道远。
新版页面设置了行业要闻、大智移云、数字安全、隐私保护、技术前沿、网安科普、评论观察、对话访谈等栏目。其中，“大智移云”板块由之前的数据安全、云安全、物联网等栏目整合而来，集中呈现大数据、人工智能、移动互联网、云计算等技术交融渗透，对社会生产生活带来的改变；新增设的“数字安全”板块，体现了数字时代下安全形势日益严峻，数字安全升级为新趋势、新方向；其余栏目维持既有板块，继续与大家共同见证行业持续发展。
页面上较为醒目的是“安全Lab”区域。该板块以新颖的“图云”形式，将过去一年网络安全频道的典型项目、品牌活动集中展示。十余幅图片海报交错排布、动态跳动，宛如一张时刻运动的安全之网，喻示着网络安全“是动态的而不是静态的”，需要从业者树立动态、综合的防护理念。
网络安全频道“安全Lab”区域
网络安全频道“融•安全”区域
此外，页面设置“融•安全”板块，重点呈现互联网领域重大活动专题页面；“E•视听”板块集纳相关直播、短视频、Vlog/Plog、动画、长图等新媒体产品，通过轻量化内容传播，做好网络安全科普知识宣传。
值得一提的是，2023年1月1日，光明网数字化频道（https://digital.gmw.cn/）上线。在新的一年里，数字化频道、网络安全频道将融合联动，持续输出更具“光明特色”的互联网领域报道。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 彩神彩票地图 |
